首页> 外文OA文献 >Kebutuhan Fasilitas Penyeberang Jalan dengan Metode Gap Kritis (Studi Kasus Jalan Raya Semarang – Kendal Km. 16.50)
【2h】

Kebutuhan Fasilitas Penyeberang Jalan dengan Metode Gap Kritis (Studi Kasus Jalan Raya Semarang – Kendal Km. 16.50)

机译:使用临界间隙法对穿越设施的需求(三宝垄-肯德尔高速公路公里16.50案例研究)

摘要

This study want to measure the performance of pedestrian facilities ( zebra cross), particularly the critical gapanalysis to see the level of opportunity to cross the street safely. To support the recommendations that will be setin addition to the critical gap method will be investigated also waiting time and total time to cross the street andanalysis of types of facilities based on the volume of pedestrian and vehicle volume as the raw determination ofthe crossing facility.From some discussion can be summarized that according to the study analyzes the volume of pedestrian andvehicle volumes obtained by the recommended pedestrian facilities according to standard determination of thecrossing facility is the type of pelican crossing with a separator. Based on the analysis of waiting time to crossthe street, 93% require pedestrian waiting time, with the average waiting time to cross and the total time tocross at that location, which is 56.61 seconds and 79.25 seconds. The condition is very far from the pedestrianshould not waiting more than 30 seconds.Results of analysis of critical gaps, both based on the critical gap only in the morning or combined critical gapin the morning and afternoon shows very little chance of crossing the road owned by the defector, on themorning of 7 times for critical gap in only the morning and 11 times for a combination of critical gap Total 125waders for 06.30 until 7:30 pm, and 20 times based on a critical gap only in the morning a and 29 times forcritical gap combination of pedestrian total of 66 people over at 07.30 until 08:30 pm.Thus based on the results of some analysis that has been done can be concluded that pedestrian facilities are noteffectively to use zebra cross type . The proposed type of road crossing facilities on arterial roads for thepedestrian to use a pedestrian facility type like overpass or underpass to eliminate conflicts between thevehicle flow and a pedestrian crossing.
机译:这项研究想衡量行人设施(斑马线)的性能,特别是进行临界间隙分析,以了解安全过马路的机会水平。为了支持将要提出的建议以及临界差距法,还将研究等待时间和过马路的总时间,并基于行人和车辆的数量来分析设施的类型,作为对穿越设施的原始确定。可以总结出一些讨论,根据研究结果,根据推荐的行人设施所获得的行人和车辆的体积进行分析,并根据标准确定,该行人设施是带分隔符的鹈鹕过境类型。根据对过马路的等待时间的分析,有93%的人需要行人的等待时间,平均过马路时间和该位置的过马路总时间为56.61秒和79.25秒。该条件距离行人非常远,不应等待超过30秒。临界间隙的分析结果(仅基于上午的临界间隙或早晨和下午的组合临界间隙)表明,过马路的可能性很小。叛逃者,仅在早上清晨7次临界间隙,在早上清晨11次综合临界间隙,总计06.30到7:30 pm总共125个投注,而在早上a和29次基于临界间隙的20次对于在07.30到08:30 pm共有66人的临界缺口组合。因此,根据所做的一些分析结果可以得出结论,行人设施使用斑马线式无效。建议的干线道路上的过路设施类型,供行人使用天桥或地下通道等行人设施类型,以消除车辆流量和人行横道之间的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号